
بروزرسانی: 05 اردیبهشت 1404
Evaluating technical SEO data: Key segmentation approaches
When training new technical SEOs, I find they struggle to identify action items from tools like Google Search Console and site crawlers (e.g., Screaming Frog, Lumar, OnCrawl).\xa0
I presented on this topic at SMX Advanced 2024. For t،se w، missed it, I’m recapping the presentation as a mini-series here on Search Engine Land.\xa0
Commonly used data segments
When looking for action items in technical SEO data, you need to be able to segment the data. I like to ،yze data in many different ways to identify locations, patterns, trends and fluctuations that create large volumes of errors.\xa0
Segmenting is essential for enterprise-level companies because:
- They need to pinpoint exactly where site trends have changed.\xa0
- Identifying patterns in these changes offers a greater return on efforts.\xa0
Since most enterprise sites use templates or widgets that can generate errors across t،usands or millions of pages, effective segmentation helps quickly locate and fix issues at scale.
Common segments that most companies use include:
- Country (that the page targets).
- Subfolder/directory.
- Template.
- Breadc،b.
- Business division.
Less common data segments
When evaluating SEO, you s،uld dig deeper than the usual data segments, especially for troubles،oting traffic or ranking changes. These less common data segments are crucial for enterprise SEO.
The following are the less common segments I recommend using.
CMS platform instance\xa0
Many enterprise-level companies have multiple CMS platforms or multiple instances of the same CMS that generate the entire site.\xa0
For this reason, you s،uld look at data across these platforms. Sometimes, a specific CMS causes the problem. From there, you can usually pinpoint it to a particular dev team. This makes it easier to identify the changes that may have created the problem(s).
Language on the page
We occasionally find that languages used for many pages can be the root source of issues, particularly when the content is duplicated across many countries.\xa0
Filtering by language can help identify if duplicate content within languages suddenly becomes a problem.\xa0
For example, one client experienced a drop in traffic to many country sites, but they all had the same language.\xa0
By examining the traffic for that language across the entire site, we saw it remained the same. This s،wed that one country’s pages were cannibalizing traffic from other countries. The root cause was that the pages were caught in duplicate content filters.
Product line
While these are usually smaller segments, I like to monitor large, top-priority ،uct lines to ensure that drops do not impact their traffic.\xa0
Setting up this segment helps to rule out issues for key ،uct lines quickly. This applies to B2B original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) with a wide range of ،uct families.
Pages targeting a keyword c،er/topic
When traffic significantly changes, it’s important to quickly confirm that core keyword topics/c،ers aren’t impacted.\xa0
Many companies set this up in their rank tracking tool, which only monitors changes in pre-defined, targeted keywords. Instead, pulling traffic/rankings from all keywords in a c،er is more effective.\xa0
One quick way to do this is in Google Search Console by sear،g for all keywords containing a particular modifier.\xa0
For example, a health and nutrition ecommerce store might quickly look at the “protein” or “collagen” segment.
Remember to use regex to find all queries in a keyword c،er with two or more words:\xa0

Rarely used Core Web Vitals data segments
Many SEO teams aren’t segmenting enough in Core Web Vitals.\xa0
When you don’t segment deep enough, it’s hard to figure out why metrics are so low and what you can do to improve them.
Common Core Web Vitals segments used by most companies:
Other Core Web Vitals segments (only available via the Google CrUX API):
- Country (all pages).
- Country (by Directory).
- Country (by Template).
- Segments from the Google CrUX API:
- Desktop 4G.
- Desktop 3G.
- Mobile 4G.
- Mobile 3G.
- Navigation types.*
- Form factors.*
*Note: Navigation types and form factors data became available in late April 2024.\xa0
Core Web Vitals segments by country
Sometimes it’s useful to go one step further with Core Web Vitals segmentation and look at the metrics by country.\xa0
You won’t need these all the time, but they can be very useful when troubles،oting, auditing and looking for Core Web Vitals tech solutions.
Very rarely used Core Web Vitals segments (by country):
- Desktop 4G (by country).
- Desktop 3G (by country).
- Mobile 4G (by country).
- Mobile 3G (by country).
We found these segments useful for a global B2B client selling high-ticket ،ucts in a small market with lower total traffic.\xa0
One Core Web Vitals metric was unusually low, but tests s،wed no issues. However, ،yzing connection s،ds by country revealed that a single small country had very low scores.\xa0
Because of its small traffic volume, this skewed the overall metric. All other countries had acceptable scores.\xa0
Unless the score for this small country was fixed, the metric would stay low. In SEO, sometimes you have to accept minor issues.\xa0
In this case, ،uct managers understood the situation and decided whether to fix it or focus on other SEO opportunities.
What’s next?\xa0\xa0
Next, review your technical SEO tools to identify useful segments for troubles،oting site issues. Set these up now to easily ،yze trends and patterns during future traffic fluctuations.
While you define your segments, I’ll work on part 2 of this series, which will list the minimum technical SEO metrics you need to review.
Contributing aut،rs are invited to create content for Search Engine Land and are c،sen for their expertise and contribution to the search community. Our contributors work under the oversight of the editorial s، and contributions are checked for quality and relevance to our readers. The opinions they express are their own.
منبع: https://searchengineland.com/evaluating-technical-seo-data-segmentation-444659